The Stellar Development Foundation, developers of the Stellar network, released a financial inclusion framework for judging the efficacy of emerging market blockchain projects. The framework was developed in cooperation with consultants PricewaterhouseCoopers International (PwC) and was explained in a white paper published on September 25.
Using this framework, the teams concluded that blockchain payments solutions significantly increased access to financial products by lowering fees to 1% or less. They also found that blockchain products have increased the speed of payments and helped users to avoid inflation.
Financial inclusion framework parameters. Source: Stellar, PwC.
Some blockchain developers claim their products can enhance “financial inclusion.” In other words, they say their products can provide services to unbanked people living in the developing world. Making this claim has become an effective way for some Web3 projects to gain funding. For example, the United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) has listed eight blockchain projects that it has helped fund so far based on this idea.
However, in their paper, Stellar and PwC argued that projects can fail to enhance financial inclusion if they don’t have a framework for evaluating what is needed for success. “As with any technological innovation, the need for robust governance and responsible design principles are key to successful implementation,” they said.
To help foster this governance, the two teams proposed a framework to judge whether a project will likely promote financial inclusion. The framework consists of four parameters: access, quality, trust and usage. Each of these parameters is broken down into further sub-parameters. For example, “access” is broken down further into affordability, connectivity, and ease of initiation.
Each explanation of a sub-parameter includes a proposed way of measuring it. For example, Stellar and PwC list “# of CICO [cash in/cash out] locations within relevant target population region” as a way of measuring the “connectivity” metric. This is intended to help ensure that projects can scientifically measure their effectiveness instead of relying on guesswork.
The teams also suggested a four-phase assessment process that projects should undergo to solve a financial inclusion problem. The project should identify a solution, target population, and relevant jurisdiction in the first phase. In phase 2, they should identify barriers preventing the target population from receiving financial services. In phase 3, they should use “level charts and guidance” to determine the biggest roadblocks to onboarding users. And in the final phase, they should implement solutions that “prioritize key parameters” to make the most effective use of funds.
Phases to implement financial inclusiveness framework. Source: Stellar, PwC.
Using this framework, the teams identified at least two blockchain solutions that have proven to be effective at enhancing financial inclusion. The first is payments. The teams found that traditional financial apps charge an average of 2.7-3.5% to send money between the United States and the market being studied, whereas blockchain-based solutions charged 1% or less, based on a study of 12 applications operating in Colombia, Argentina, Kenya, and the Philippines. They found that these applications increased access by making electronic payments available to people who otherwise couldn’t afford them.
The second effective solution they found was savings. The team claimed that a stablecoin application in Argentina allows users to invest in an inflation-resistant digital asset, helping them to preserve their wealth when they otherwise would have lost it.
Stellar network has been on the forefront of payment inclusion in underserved financial markets. In December, it announced a program to aid charity organizations distribute funds to help Ukrainian refugees fleeing war. On September 26, they announced a partnership with Moneygram to produce a non-custodial crypto wallet that can be used in over 180 countries. However, some financial and monetary experts have criticized the use of cryptocurrency in emerging markets. For example, a paper published by the Bank of International Settlements on August 22 argued that cryptocurrency has “amplified financial risks” in emerging market economies.
